What hasn’t discussed, however, is the question why these gangs always seem to target white women and not their own women for prostitution.
From a sociobiological perspective, it seems to be a classic case of in-group / out-group dynamics. The South Asians protect their own women to save for marriage and procreation, while prostituting the out-group, white women in this case, for economic benefit.
In a chilling article for Gates of Vienna, a Norwegian describes the double-standard that the more aggressive Third World immigrants have created in the pursuit of women:
“There is one thing that annoys the hell out of me. They can start chasing Norwegian girls, but we cannot go after theirs. It’s something you learn early on. You just don’t go after a Pakistani girl, but Norwegian girls are available to immigrant boys. Norwegian girls prefer them. I don’t know why. I guess it must be that brown skin. That they are tough, that they have money despite not having jobs. They don’t see that they fight in packs, that they are cowards.”
In short, whites are at a great disadvantage in multiracial societies. Part of the problem is the individualism of whites; whites think in terms of individuals, thus giving other groups who bond together an advantage. In a broader sense, whites too often think in universalist terms (rather than in-group / out-group dynamics). Such universalist thinking is probably harmless in isolated racially homogenous societies, but it’s suicidal in multiracial societies. This in part explains why white journalists are so naive when confronted with the fact that South Asians were deliberately targeting white women for prostitution rings.
Ed Rubenstein: “Lesson From 1965: More Third World Immigrants = More Violent Crime“
Ted Sallis: “What the Immigration Debate Really Should Be About”