The biggest lie told about PRISM

President Obama defends PRISM as a necessary measure to stop terrorism and to save your life: “[PRISM] helps us prevent terrorist attacks.” ~ RYOT

The pro-PRISM propaganda is really amping up.  Many leftists have already criticized Obama over PRISM but I suspect they’ll soon be whipped back into line.

Perhaps the biggest lie told so far is that its primary purpose is to protect against terrorism.  If you believe that, I have some oceanfront property in Nebraska I’d like to sell you…

Despite the occasional domestic terrorist attack, most terrorists come from the Third World.  In fact, the vast majority of terrorists in the USA in the past couple decades have either been legal or illegal immigrants into the USA.   In short, terrorism is just as much an immigration issue as a national security issue, if not more so.

This is anarcho-tyranny in action.  Import a bunch of Third World terrorists into the USA and then spend billions of dollars to try to stop them, all the while infringing upon the liberties of the native-born population.

Immigration reduction is actually something that can be managed – whether through attrition or deportation.

And immigration enforcement, compared to the anarcho-tyranny immigration brings, is actually cheap, when one considers the trillions of dollars that Third World immigrants cost the USA – in education, welfare, hospital visits, etc.  Just one small example:  The state of Texas now spends over $1 billion annually on ESL (English-Second-Language courses) alone!


Primer on Immigration and Human BioDiversity

Mangan:  “Why Spy?”

HBD Chick:  PRISM roundup



5 thoughts on “The biggest lie told about PRISM

  1. “anarcho-tyranny”

    Hurray, you used this Sam Francis term which perfectly explains the domestic behavior of FedGov – refuse to control the criminals/alien, but insists on controlling the innocent/native population. There are a multitude of reasons for this behavior, but most important is that it centralizes power.

  2. Reading the life and times of Machiavelli, he once advised the Florentine government that the way the ancient Romans dealt with a rebellious province was either to kill all the leaders or import foreigners so that the rebellious people were a minority within their own country.

    Think Schumer ever read the complete works of Machiavelli?

  3. Sorry to hammer it home, but this, along with dumbing down education, and teaching critical theory are the biggies in how we have lost the war with polite conservatism. Our people must learn and understand our enemy and his methods:

    Anarcho-tyranny from Wiki:

    Samuel Francis argued that the problems of the managerial state extend to issues of crime and justice. In 1992, he introduced the word “anarcho-tyranny” into the paleocon vocabulary.[36] He once defined it this way: “we refuse to control real criminals (that’s the anarchy) so we control the innocent (that’s the tyranny).”[37]

    In one of his last essays, he explained the concept:

    What we have in this country today, then, is both anarchy (the failure of the state to enforce the laws) and, at the same time, tyranny – the enforcement of laws by the state for oppressive purposes; the criminalization of the law-abiding and innocent through exorbitant taxation, bureaucratic regulation, the invasion of privacy, and the engineering of social institutions, such as the family and local schools; the imposition of thought control through “sensitivity training” and multiculturalist curricula, “hate crime” laws, gun-control laws that punish or disarm otherwise law-abiding citizens but have no impact on violent criminals who get guns illegally, and a vast labyrinth of other measures. In a word, anarcho-tyranny.[36]

    Francis argues that this situation extends across the U.S. and Europe. While the government functions normally, violent crime remains a constant, creating a climate of fear (anarchy). He says that “laws that are supposed to protect ordinary citizens against ordinary criminals” routinely go unenforced, even though the state is “perfectly capable” of doing so. While this problem rages on, government elites concentrate their interests on law-abiding citizens. In fact, Middle America winds up on the receiving end of both anarchy and tyranny.[36]

    The laws that are enforced are either those that extend or entrench the power of the state and its allies and internal elites … or else they are the laws that directly punish those recalcitrant and “pathological” elements in society who insist on behaving according to traditional norms – people who do not like to pay taxes, wear seat belts, or deliver their children to the mind-bending therapists who run the public schools; or the people who own and keep firearms, display or even wear the Confederate flag, put up Christmas trees, spank their children, and quote the Constitution or the Bible – not to mention dissident political figures who actually run for office and try to do something about mass immigration by Third World populations.[36]

    Francis argued that anarcho-tyranny is built into the managerial system and cannot be solved simply by fighting corruption or voting out incumbents. In fact, he says that the system generates a false “conservatism” that encourages people to act passively in the face of perpetual revolution. He concludes that only by devolving power back toward law-abiding citizens can sanity be restored.[36]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s