Here are some images representative of pathological altruism and ethnomasochism among whites. If you have any more, please reference them in the comments below and I’ll add them.
Here are some images representative of pathological altruism and ethnomasochism among whites. If you have any more, please reference them in the comments below and I’ll add them.
Evolutionary theory might inform you of a couple of things.
First:
Second, ethnic or racial “solidarity” isn’t a “natural” state of affairs per se, because there’s no way it could have evolved. Modern racial and ethnic nationalists are basically choosing teams in the classic (and ultimately flexible) struggle of human “in-groups” and “out-groups,” or are merely (generally indiscriminately) xenophobic.
I agree with statement that what we today think of pathological altruism might have been adaptive in the past — in small homogenous NW European countries. This might very well be true.
However, I disagree that there is now way that racial solidarity could have evolved. With group selection, it easily could have evolved. However, one doesn’t even need group selection (which many reject for individual selection). Even on a model of individual selection, it can easily be shown how racial solidarity could have evolved. See this paper by Robert Axelrod. Harpending also seems to think along similar lines (here), and probably even Dawkins too (here) although he’s coy about it.
@AWC:
With good reason, because it doesn’t exist. All selection is overwhelmingly on the individual level, or that of close kin.
I think Henry Harpending is wrong on this one. Any theory of ethnic nepotism – ethnic favoritism based on kin selection – just isn’t going to work. The relationship coefficients don’t work out.
As for Axelrod’s paper, I think there may be something to that, but I wouldn’t call it “ethnic” favoritism per se. In-group favoritism, more like it. Who is designated part of the in-group vs. the out-group has little to do with genetic relationship (see above) and more to do with somewhat arbitrary discriminants.
Reblogged this on ElderofZyklon's Blog!.
These people are NOT making sacrifices or being noble.
They are seeking status and benefits by displaying their ‘morality’ to manipulate other white people. They are trying to benefit by condemning people while making no sacrifice themselves.
This is really contemptible behavior. These people are rejected in some way by their communities and this is how they seek revenge, attention and status. It looks so childish.
Pingback: Images of white ethnomasochism & pathological altruism | Reaction Times
You could add any photo of a White at a sports stadium where most of the participants are black. Triple word score if they have a replica shirt with a negro’s name on it.
I’ve seen many Whites with shirts bearing the image of the overrated bongo bongo ‘musician’ Bob Marley.
If grown men wish to engage in such masochistic behavior, well, I find it disgusting, but it’s on them. Heck, they can pay well-endowed black men to screw their wives before them, if that’s their fetish.
However, some of the people in these pictures appear to be children. Forcing children to engage in such a display is clearly child abuse, which could well warp them for life. The parents of these children should lose custody.
“Forcing children to engage in such a display is clearly child abuse, which could well warp them for life. The parents of these children should lose custody.”
Do you, or children, send the kids or grandkids to publics school? Same thing happens there just not as blatantly (almost, but not quite).
This is not the future we forsee:
http://www.amazon.com/Foundations-Twenty-First-Century-Nationalism/dp/1463562217/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1416947721&sr=8-1&keywords=frank+l.+desilva&pebp=1416947727094
I have no idea what evangelical group is pictured voting for massive Third World immigration, but I speak for most of my evangelical Christian friends when I say that there is an ENORMOUS percentage of us that strongly oppose opening our doors and throwing out the Welcome mat to the low-IQ Third World. In fact, some of the very first missionaries to Africa wrote extensively about their interactions with the savages, and their conclusion was that the Africans were completely incompatible with civilized society. Furthermore, they urged Americans to follow through with the repatriation of freed slaves (and all blacks) after the Civil War, saying that the “equality of the Negro and white race” goes against God and the natural order of the universe, and if implemented into law, would be disastrous for America. They warned us, but our predecessors didn’t heed their advice.
(“Negroes in Negroland”…you can buy it or download it from Amazon)