Is Contemporary Christianity a Suicide Cult?

Although I’m not very religious, religion interests me, especially the current trajectory of Christianity in the West.  What I mean here is mainstream Christianity in the United States and Europe, not non-Western Christianity such as the rise of black or mestizo Christianity that one finds in the Global South nor the small pockets of Uncucked Christianity one might find.   The Christianity I’m referencing here is mainstream and practiced almost exclusively by white people:  We’ll call it Cucked Christianity.

As I and many others have noted, this Cucked Christianity is fast becoming a suicide cult. Here are some recent examples:

  • Christian cucks basically support the Third World immigration and refugee invasion of their own countries.  Literally.  Some of them even wear “Refugees Welcome” t-shirts and make SJWs look masculine.  Granted, some of them, like hustler Russell Moore whose Evangelical Immigration Table is funded by George Soros, have economic incentives, but a good many of them are dong it just for the sake of empty virtue signaling.  And all these people are inconsistent; as someone noted in an email list, “None of them would criticize Israel for building a wall, refusing Syrian refugees, or deporting African immigrants,” but they have no problem condemning their own countries to Third World status.
  • Cucked Christians have become obsessed with this notion of all people being “image bearers”.  Their flawed logic goes that all people have the image of God so therefore it’s wrong to deport immigrants, refuse refugees,etc.  By this cucked logic, anyone promoting self-preservation, in fact anything other than ethnomasocism, is wrong because it might hurt the person or feelz of an image bearer.
  • Cucked Christians recently have become obsessed with this Cultural Marxist notion of ‘racial reconciliation‘ which essentially amounts to whites promoting their own dispossession.  You literally have white cucks criticizing churches for being “too white”; yet, these same cucks would never criticize Israel for being too Jewish or Ashkenazi, nor a black church for being too black.
  • Cucked Christians have recently tied the pro-life movement to the support of Third World immigration.  In this version, to be pro-life one must support the Third World immigration invasion of his own lands.  For example, cuckservative Cardinal Timothy Dolan recently told a crowd that unless they support the Third World immigration invasion of the West, they are not pro-life.  Coupling pro-life with immigration probably signals the last gasp of the pro-life movement.
  • Cucked Christians are basically telling white people not to make white babies but to adopt black or mestizo babies instead.  This is literal cuckoldry, which is unhealthy.

How did we get here?  How has contemporary mainstream Christianity become such a suicide cult?

I mean, just over a thousand years ago when a Moorish invasion of Charlemagne’s kingdom was taking place, Christians do not hesitate to take up arms and repel the invaders.  Today, Cucked Christians welcome the invaders.  What happened?

Here’s my brief theory:

Women are more religious than men.  For the past few hundred years, church attendance, for all denominations, has been higher for women than men.   Nonetheless, the leadership of said churches was by men.  And until recently, because Christianity still had prestige, you would get more normal men in church leadership positions.  However, over the past 75 years or so, a selection process has been taking place.  As Christianity lost prestige, more normal, healthy men have moved along to other pastures and forsaken any interest in church leadership positions.  As a result, the entire apparatus of Western Christianity has largely been overtaken by beta girly men.  Today you have a bunch of beta males, often literal cuckolds, who incessantly whine like little pansies:  “Welcome the stranger.”  “You’re deporting an image bearer.”  “Racial reconciliation means for your next kid, consider transracial adoption.”

My hunch is that these new leaders have bad genes for self-preservation.   In a normal, healthy society, they might have jobs as caregivers, but they certainly wouldn’t be given the keys to the kingdom or have any say in politics.  The fact that these people now hold positions of power does not bode well.

In terms of sociobiology, the current trend of Cucked Christianity is not healthy, i.e. adaptive.  And this maladaptive behavior cannot last forever.  Does it mean that end of Christianity in the West, or will a newer, uncucked form of Christianity rise to replace it?

Related:

Are Christian Leaders Today a Bunch of Girly Men?

Russell Moore and the ERLC Exposed

What is Christian Cultural Marxism?

cucked-christianitycardinal-timothy-dolan
cuck-ed-stetzer

Updates:

This article was also posted at alright.com.

Russell Moore and the ERLC Exposed

Something rotten is happening with the ERLC (Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, a lobbyist organization of the Southern Baptist Convention) and its president, Russell Moore.   Throughout the latest presidential campaign, Russell Moore used the resources of the ERLC to viciously campaign against Donald Trump, while simultaneously, at least in the GOP primaries, to campaign on behalf of open-borders neocons Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio.  Trump won, and now many Southern Baptists are calling Russell Moore to resign from the ERLC, thinking he has damaged their image.  (Nonetheless, Moore still has a vocal cheerleading squad of largely whiney beta males.)

In an email list I’m on, I recently found some very interesting gossip about Russell Moore.  For at least a couple years, Russell Moore has been criticized by many on the right.   His theology seems not far removed from liberation theology (Christian Cultural Marxism).  His real passion is the support of the Third World immigration invasion of the West and, it turns out, his open-borders Evangelical Immigration Table is actually funded by George Soros.  Nonetheless, the media love Moore, largely because he agrees with them on nearly everything, so they’ll use him as their “go to” “religious conservative” for sound bites in favor of Third World immigration or any of their other pet causes.

People within the field of theology have said that Russell Moore is not very bright. One hundreds years ago, a Protestant theology professor would be proficient in Greek, Latin and German (German to fully understand the Reformation).  Moore, I’m told, is largely historically and linguistically illiterate.  Moore, it has been said, seems to watch a bunch of television, absorb the Cultural Marxist values presented on television, and then read these values back into Christianity.  In some respects, he’s a more southern version of what Jim Jones was doing in the 1970s.

So, why was Moore chosen to head the ERLC?

This is where the story gets really interesting.  It turns out that the chairman of the ERLC, Ken Barbic, is in fact an open-borders, cheap-labor lobbyist for the ag-industry.  Furthermore, it seems that Ken Barbic was central in selecting Russell Moore to replace Richard Land as the head of the ERLC.

Let that sink in for a moment.  The ERLC, which is supposed to be devoted to pursuing religious liberty, is chaired by an open-borders, cheap labor lobbyist, who chose, for its president, another open-borders fanatic.  What does this have to do with religious liberty?  Do most Southern Baptists even know about this corruption?

Perhaps the ERLC should change its mission statement to: “For the express purpose of driving down American wages, draining social services, and making the USA a Third World wasteland though mass Third World immigration.”  This seems to be the real agenda of the ERLC.

 

 

Updates:

As others have noted, the major divisions within Christianity are no longer Protestant vs Catholicism vs Orthodox, but rather Western Christianity vs Global-South Christianity.  In Africa and Latin America, new, non-Western forms of Christianity are quickly arising and, in many cases, they’re explicitly anti-white.  On the other hand, within the West, we’re witnessing the division between Cucked Christianity vs Uncucked Christianity.  Cucked Christianity largely entails white beta males, and some females, constantly virtue signaling about the need for Third World immigration, transracial adoption, etc.  Cucked Christianity, as you can imagine, contains mostly whiney, girly men.  Representative of this trend would be Pope Francis and, the subject of this post, Russell Moore.  Uncucked Christianity, however, entails Christianity at peace with reality, such as human biodiversity (HBD), ethnocentrism, and the ability for nations to repel the Third World immigration invasions.

 

Some interesting memes and images floating around 8Chan:

russell-moore-erlc-southern-baptist

 

russell-moore-twitter

 

ken-barbic-erlc

 

cucked-christianity

 

2vvqgc3-jpg

 

Related:

Are Christian Leaders Today A Bunch of Girly Men

Human Biodiversity and Immigration

 

What is Christian Cultural Marxism?

Mainstream Christianity today is not only weird, it’s crazy.  And it’s not only left-wing Christianity, it’s supposed “conservative” mainstream Christianity as well.  The entire vessel seems to be on a course of collective suicide.

When surveying the insanity of contemporary Christianity among white people, it’s hard exactly to label it.  There seems to be no precise label.  “Cuckoldy” is probably the best label, but since others already call it “Christian Cultural Marxism,” I’ll stick with that term.

What’s the Holy Trinity of this new form of Christianity – Christian Cultural Marxism?

The Holy Trinity of Christian Cultural Marxism

  1.  You must support open-borders.  White people must commit collective suicide and turn over their nations to the invading hordes of the third world.
  2. White should avoid having too many white babies and adopt babies of color instead.
  3. Fighting racism is one of the main priorities of Christians.

If you think I’m exaggerating, just look around.

Immigration. The entire Catholic leadership and a significant portion of Protestant leadership support the third world invasion of the West.  The Catholic Church is the worst in this respect, but you have many Protestants (like Russell Moore and others) who also support the invasion.

Adoption.  You literally have Catholic priests and Protestant pastors telling whites it’s their duty to adopt the unwanted garbage of the third world. This is not only maladaptive in a sociobiological sense, it’s also literal cuckoldry.  Resources are finite.  By adopting the third world, these whites are forgoing their own reproductive inclusive fitness.

Fighting Racism.  Both Catholics and the Southern Baptist Convention recently held conferences saying that churches need to devote more of their resources to “fighting racism.”

So, basically, in short, Christianity today, even “conservative” Christianity, is basically a form of SJW-ism…

How did this happen?

Christianity 200 years ago certainly wasn’t this way.  But was the momentum there?  By being too universalist, is Christianity doomed to become eventually a suicide cult?

If you want to see something sad — actually look at these cuckolds adopting the third world.  They’re pathetic.  They’re barely even men.

Which raises another question of why masculine men aren’t drawn to Christianity today, although this tendency has been there for the past 300 years.  Indeed, even 200 years ago, more women attended church than men.  But today it’s even worse. Could part of it be that nearly all the pastors and priests today are cucked, effeminate weaklings that alienate any man with even the slightest bit of testosterone in his testicles?

You decide.

2vvqgc3-jpg

Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry (@pegobry) jumps on the Marxist bandwagon

The French Catholic neoconservative Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry has a ridiculously trite article out at The Week entitled “Gay marriage, racism, and what everyone misses about the inevitability of social change.” Normally, I wouldn’t pay much attention to such prattle, but since it is getting attention on Twitter, I thought I’d address it.  Gobry, by the way, has had contact with various reactionaries, although he has denounced the Dark Enlightenment as “racist” — shocking.  That said, Gobry is not new to parroting the latest nonsense of neoconservatives and Cultural Marxists — whether it’s bombing North Korea, flooding Europe and the USA with Third World immigrants, or demanding that whites pay reparations to non-whites.

I indeed find it interesting that mainstream Christians today – both Catholic and Protestant – seem to have wholeheartedly adopted the mindset of Cultural Marxists, as Gobry does in his latest article by insisting that race is a “social construct”.  The one issue that Christians have not yet given into the Cultural Marxists is gay marriage, but this is only matter of time and, as I’ll show, Gobry’s very “reasoning” paves the way for gay marriage.

Gobry, in his latest, argues that gay marriage is not inevitable because tokens of progress have been wrong in the past.  His bogeymen of false tokens of past progress are the concept of race and eugenics (with, of course, the obligatory reference to Margaret Sanger).  He writes:

“As people on the left of the left, who usually care more about the history of ideas than milquetoast progressives, never tire of pointing out (and rightly), race is a social construct…. [Race] is an idea that has a very specific history, whose birth can be dated, which came to dominate the cultural worldview, and thence changed law and behavior. In other words, it was a socio-cultural revolution.”

At least Gobry is honest about siding with the far left, although he doesn’t correctly identify its origins.  (One of the first Marxists to champion the idea of race as a “social construct” was Franz Boas, who recently has recently been proven to be a fraud. Marxist Stephen Jay Gould has also been shown to be a fraud.)

Gobry seems to think that somehow the science of race is wrong since it’s a product of the Enlightenment, or, more specifically, the Scientific Revolution:

GobryThis reasoning, however, is wrong on a number of counts.

First, race in and of itself is not a modern concept.   As Vincent Sarich & Frank Miele point out in the “Ancient Concept of Race,” the Ancient Greeks, Romans, Chinese, and later Muslims all had concepts of race.

What is different about the modern concept of race is that it is more scientific.  And this is supposed to discredit it?  Modern genetics is also a product of this “socio-cultural revolution,” so it should also be discredited?  Maybe Gobry thinks so, since genetics overwhelmingly proves the biological reality of race:

RacesoftheWorld3

Like all good Marxist Christians today, Gobry quotes Galatians 3:28: “There is neither Jew nor Greek, neither male nor female, but all are one in Christ Jesus.”  I’m not very religious nor am I an expert on Biblical exegesis, but scholars have told me that the traditional interpretation of this passage is one of a heavenly allegory but the more recent Marxist interpretation is that on Earth race and gender aren’t real but are “social constructs”. Gobry obviously sides with the later interpretation.

Which undermines Gobry’s very support of traditional marriage.  For, if gender – like race – is but a social construct, then why should any credence be given to traditional marriage grounded in a biological notion of reproduction (as the Latin verb maritare suggests by meaning both to marry and impregnate).  If gender is but a social construct, then participants in marriage should not be be discriminated against by gender.

Such deductions, however, may be beyond the intellectual powers of grandstanders like Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry.

Updates:

Michael B Dougherty seems to agree with the article because of something someone might have once said about his ancestors 100 years ago.  Newsflash, Michael, the Irish genetically cluster with Europeans and and there were never anti-miscegenation laws against the Irish.

Gobry warns that ideas like HBD must be kept “marginal”.

The Duck tells it like it is.

Images of white ethnomasochism & pathological altruism

Here are some images representative of pathological altruism and ethnomasochism among whites.  If you have any more, please reference them in the comments below and I’ll add them.

1901773_1477269582561776_8192164619332463581_n

oubredwhitepathologicalaltruism

Whites asking forgiveness for slavery

White woman begging for forgiveness for slavery

White woman begging for forgiveness for slavery

 

Christians praying for the Third World immigration invasion of the USA

Christians praying for the Third World immigration invasion of the USA

 

Will Catholic Church become an African wasteland?

A stir was recently caused when liberal Cardinal Walter Kasper allegedly told a reporter that the Vatican should not really care what Africans think on theology, since Africans aren’t very enlightened, which Kasper later denied saying.    Of course, this comment is straightforwardly true.  The average IQ of Sub-Sahara Africans is quite low (65 – 75) and the cause is most likely genetic. Nonetheless, this statement has caused all the pointing-and-stuttering indignation from “conservative” American Catholics, who seem to think that Africa is on the cutting edge of civilization.  Just look at the indignation from the Twitter feed of First Thing‘s Matthew Schmitz, who at least is consoled that African Catholics will soon outnumber European Catholics.  He looks forward to an African Church that someday will be lorded over by some African witch doctor.

As I and others have noted previously, two things are taking place right now with Christianity: (1) Inside the West, Christianity is becoming indistinguishable from Cultural Marxism (think of Christian leaders’ fanatical support of mass immigration and non-white adoption); (2) outside the West, Christianity is becoming a non-Western religion, mostly notably among the blacks of Africa and the Mestizos and Amerindians of Latin America.    For white Christians, what is the way out of this dilemma?

Related:

Are Christian Leaders Today a Bunch of Girly Men?

A new trend: Identitarian Religion

The Laws of the Cathedral. Obey or Perish

Why the religious should reject Intelligent Design

Cthulhu and the White worldview

Moldbug famously (at least in some quarters) once wrote that Cthulhu only swims left.  Having myself recently re-read H. P. Lovecraft’s “The Call of Cthulhu,” I’ve been thinking about what Cthulhu means.

One interesting facet of Lovecraft’s story is how HBD-friendly it is; in fact, “The Call of Cthulhu” could be called “HBD literature,” if such a genre exists.  In the story, you find ancient gods (extraterrestrials), which are adamantly worshiped by non-whites, especially blacks, mulattoes, and mestizos.  These gods are primordial.   Whites, however, seem to have more difficult time intuiting these gods and when they do, they often die.  Professor George Gammell Angell, the Norwegian sailor, and the narrator (it’s implied) all die after coming into some form of contact with Cthulhu.  It reminds me of a passage from Nicholas Wade’s The Faith Instinct where someone states that Westerners (European-descended people) now seem psychologically incapable of the collective ecstasy of primitive religion.

Sam Francis writes:

Lovecraft’s stories are dramas of modernity in which the forces of tradition and order in society and in the universe are confronted by modernity itself—in the form of the shapeless beings known (ironically) as the “Old Ones.” In fact, they are the “New Ones.” …The conflicts in the stories are typically between some representative of traditional order (the New England old stock protagonist) on the one hand, and the “hordes” of Mongoloids, Levantines, Negroes, Caribbeans, and Asians that gibber and prance in worship of the Old Ones and invoke their dark, destructive, and invincible powers.

The irony of the Old Ones is that evidence of them is often in plain sight, but whites simply cannot see them, when when whites do, it’s often through reason (such as the professor and narrator) and not through spiritual intuition.  Most whites, however, will probably never see Cthulhu; they are incapable.

Cthulhu in this sense is like HBD.  It’s right there in front of your eyes, but most whites are incapable of seeing it.  Outbred Northwest Europeans project their own psychological worldview onto the world and non-whites – for whites, it’s all blank-slate deracinated universalism.  For whites, everyone is white. (And even some non-whites strive to be be white.)  Whites can’t hear Cthulhu.

One of the wisest things ever said about HBD was actually once said to be my a black man to the effect (paraphrase): “Whites are fighting other whites about HBD.  Deep down, most blacks probably know HBD is true, even though whites tell them it is not.”

So if Cthulhu only swims left, it’s because whites allow him to do so by unknowingly ignoring his very existence instead of harnasing his primordial power.  To acknowledge Cthulhu is the ultimate red pill.  Although Lovecraft had most whites die when coming into contact with Cthulhu, this is not true of HBD.  In this case, it’s probably a sine qua non for survival.  Maybe the rise of multi-racial states will hasten Cthulhu’s return.

Cthulhu

Cthulhu