Mainstream Christianity today is not only weird, it’s crazy. And it’s not only left-wing Christianity, it’s supposed “conservative” mainstream Christianity as well. The entire vessel seems to be on a course of collective suicide.
When surveying the insanity of contemporary Christianity among white people, it’s hard exactly to label it. There seems to be no precise label. “Cuckoldy” is probably the best label, but since others already call it “Christian Cultural Marxism,” I’ll stick with that term.
What’s the Holy Trinity of this new form of Christianity – Christian Cultural Marxism?
The Holy Trinity of Christian Cultural Marxism
- You must support open-borders. White people must commit collective suicide and turn over their nations to the invading hordes of the third world.
- White should avoid having too many white babies and adopt babies of color instead.
- Fighting racism is one of the main priorities of Christians.
If you think I’m exaggerating, just look around.
Immigration. The entire Catholic leadership and a significant portion of Protestant leadership support the third world invasion of the West. The Catholic Church is the worst in this respect, but you have many Protestants (like Russell Moore and others) who also support the invasion.
Adoption. You literally have Catholic priests and Protestant pastors telling whites it’s their duty to adopt the unwanted garbage of the third world. This is not only maladaptive in a sociobiological sense, it’s also literal cuckoldry. Resources are finite. By adopting the third world, these whites are forgoing their own reproductive inclusive fitness.
Fighting Racism. Both Catholics and the Southern Baptist Convention recently held conferences saying that churches need to devote more of their resources to “fighting racism.”
So, basically, in short, Christianity today, even “conservative” Christianity, is basically a form of SJW-ism…
How did this happen?
Christianity 200 years ago certainly wasn’t this way. But was the momentum there? By being too universalist, is Christianity doomed to become eventually a suicide cult?
If you want to see something sad — actually look at these cuckolds adopting the third world. They’re pathetic. They’re barely even men.
Which raises another question of why masculine men aren’t drawn to Christianity today, although this tendency has been there for the past 300 years. Indeed, even 200 years ago, more women attended church than men. But today it’s even worse. Could part of it be that nearly all the pastors and priests today are cucked, effeminate weaklings that alienate any man with even the slightest bit of testosterone in his testicles?
You decide.
Occam's Razor 
Many of the white christians you see adopting niglets don’t seem to be very happy…deep down they probably know that they’ve trashed their entire genetic legacy
Know some cucked christians who adopted some black boy from Haiti…once he hit puberty he actually raped their white biological daughter and they got rid of him.. these people are so stupid… if they actually know anything about HBD they wouldn’t make such unwise decisions
Not at all surprised ”Goodbye America (in a photo)” (the other Chateau Hartiste blog) has mentioned several such situations, the most recent being:
This guy didn’t merely adopt already-born unwanted children, his wife ”adopted” a trio of unwanted frozen embryos – literally 3 cuckoo eggs in the nest of her own body.
Not only are they by appearance (and genetically) unrelated, there are other issues;
First, the cost of the ”reproductive tech” used to make this possible. Second, the cost of the neonatal ICU these three began their life in. Third, the fact that White males are the prime target of ”downsizing” by Corporate America, either to simply reduce headcount or to open up positions for affirmative action and/or H1b hires.
If this ”evangelical” (so described in the linked WaPo article) gets shown the door by his employer this whole latter-day Addams Family is going to be in a world of trouble.
Help from extended family, government, and their church is going to be very limited-to-nonexistent.
BTW, with three newborns at the same time, it’s safe to assume she’s not working outside the home much – if at all.
Even if things work out such as no job loss on his part or the offspring don’t grow to be problems of their own (such as above), sooner or later the reality that this is a manufactured ”family” is going to hit them both like a ton of bricks.
Pingback: What is Christian Cultural Marxism? | Aus-Alt-Right
The “Christian Cultural Marxism” that you’re seeing is very real; however, we need to understand that this is not “Christianity” but rather social clubs for nice people. Yes, the majority of these social clubs for nice people hold their meetings in “church buildings”, and the sign out front says it is a Christian church, but saying it is so does not make it so. No, the problem here is NOT Christianity – not by a long shot. The problem, as it always is, is the leftist takeover of an established institution. Sixteen years ago, I belonged to one of those social clubs for nice people, and I had been a very active member for over 40 years. Realizing that there was something very wrong, I found one of the remaining churches that truly preaches The Bible. There is nothing politically correct about it.
My point here is that we need to understand the problem, and it is NOT Christianity – it is the Marxist takeover of what used to be Christian churches.
Yes, I was going to say something similar. I think it is important to point out that you get more of this nonsense the further you get from orthodoxy, so when we say it’s not Christianity, that’s not code for “no true Scotsman”, we mean, frequently, that it is not Christianity as commonly defined in nearly all places throughout nearly all history.
Like all men, we suffer from defect of brains, heart, or guts but we can’t pin it on Christianity if the only Christian back up mad men have for their ideas are “it’s Christian because we say it is”. Moses had the sons of Core, I don’t suppose we’re any luckier than he was.
The famous Marxist maxim was lifted almost word-for-word from the New Testament. As Austrian economist Ludwig von Mises wrote, “primitive Christianity is Bolshevism.” An analysis of the Bible supports his conclusion.
(1.) Boshevists hate the Successful:
• “But woe unto you that are rich!” Luke 6:24
• “Sell all your possessions and give the money to the poor.” Matthew 19:21, Mark 10:21, Luke 18:22
• “It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.” Matthew 19:24, Mark 10:25, Luke 18:25
“…guard against all kinds of greed, life does not consist in abundance…fool…” (Parable of the Rich Fool) Luke 12:13-21
• “There was a rich man…in torment…agony…remember that in your lifetime you received your good things…” (The Rich Man and Lazarus) Luke 16:19-31
(2.) Bolshevists are collectivists:
• “…each according to his ability.” Matthew 25:15
• “…not one of them claimed that anything belonging to him was his own, but all things were common property to them.” Acts 4:32
• “…and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.” Acts 4:35
• “…the daily distribution.” Acts 6:1
• “…your liberal distribution…” 2 Corinthians 9:13
(3.) Bolshevists use coercive fear tactics to control money flows:
• “Great fear seized the whole church…” Acts 5:11
“An analysis of the Bible supports his conclusion?” There is no analysis here – you’re just repeating something that you read somewhere. Either that, or you have intentionally set out to lie about what The BIBLE says.
You’re picking verses and taking them out of context. The first section of what you quote are verses where Jesus was showing men that, despite their claims of being righteous, they really valued riches more than their eternal souls. It was primarily an illustration to make a point. Some of your quotes (your second group) describe a group of Christian brothers who VOLUNTARILY entered into a communal system. If that’s your best shot, then I’ll gladly take it. Those Christians that I worship with freely – and VOLUNTARILY – help each other. I’ve seen generosity such as you could never imagine, and those are folks that I gladly throw my lot in with. There is a huge difference between generosity and pooling resources for a project, and a collectivist system. In addition, any form of socialism is routinely condemned from the pulpit at our church as being unbiblical.
Your third group (“Great fear”) is also taken way out of context. That related the story of a couple who had entered into a contract or covenant with the group they worshipped with. They had sold a piece of land and, according to the covenant, all the funds were to go to the group; instead, they kept a portion for themselves. They had violated the covenant and were stealing from their fellow Christians. “Great fear seized the whole church” because as a result of their theft, they died right there on the spot and “the whole church” witnessed it. I’m sure “great fear” would be an appropriate reaction to seeing first a husband, and then his wife die at the direct hand of God (No, they were not killed by the church members, but by God). The verse prior to that (verse 10) that you conveniently left out, describes the situation quite clearly. Verses 1 through 11 tell the complete story.
If you want to despise Christianity, you’re free to do so, of course. Help yourself. Give the middle finger to God, if you dare; it’s a dangerous game you play though. If you try to use The BIBLE to “prove” your point, read it yourself rather than quoting from some pamphlet or blog post that you read somewhere. That’s the extent of my comments on this. The truth is available – you can take it or leave it. Your choice.
Stephen Clay. Fully agree with your comments here and further response below. As a Christian I also left the C of E many years ago as the rot had already set in then. I think one needs to recognise that it is the system (the C of E and all that goes with it) is totally unbiblical.
That is not to say that there still remain a few Bible believers within it, but as a system it is completely unreformable given its leadership, bishops and archbishops have abandoned the Bible long ago and are theologically liberal/Marxist.
I strongly recommend ‘Pagan Christianity by joint authors Frank Viola and George Barna for a fuller description. Do you know it?
Thank you. It looks like we’ve both been down the same road. Different lanes on the highway, perhaps (I was raised in the Methodist church), but the end result is the same. I’m not familiar with “Pagan Christianity” but it certainly sounds like what we are now seeing. I’ll be looking for it. Again, thank you!
Pingback: What is Christian Cultural Marxism? | Reaction Times
>Culture Industry:
The “Cultural Marxists” objected to the dangers of a money-controlled ‘Culture Industry’ and worried it was used to manipulate humanity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_industry
>Massification:
With the British Cultural Marxists complaining about the massification of culture and how it took away from the possibility of a genuine culture “of the people” (rather than of money).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Uses_of_Literacy#Massification_of_culture
>Anti-censorship:
Accordingly the British Cultural Marxists were against censorship; with Richard Hoggart and Raymond Williams of The Birmingham School standing up against censorship at The Lady Chatterley trial. A censorship trial which is thought to have made Britain in the 1960s into a more permissive society.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Chatterley's_Lover#British_obscenity_trial
>Anti-identity politics:
In their modern incarnation The Frankfurt School are against identity politics; and argue economic poverty is a more important class issue.
Go to the website: sbcvoices.com
Then scan the titles of the articles and keep clicking on the button that shows previous pages of articles and it won’t be long until you get to superlative examples of SJW Churchianity. A “pastor” there named Dave Miller is the worst. They defend blacks, illegals, and muslims, and crap on Whites.
Cuckianity has always been the original “Lowlifes Matter!” movement.
“Christianity, sprung from Jewish roots and comprehensible only as a growth on this soil, represents the counter-movement to any morality of breeding, of race, privilege: it is the anti-Aryan religion par excellence. Christianity—the revaluation of all Aryan values, the victory of chandala values, the gospel preached to the poor and base, the general revolt of all the downtrodden, the wretched, the failures, the less favored, against ‘race:’ the undying chandala hatred is disguised as a religion of love.” -Friedrich Nietzsche (Twilight of the Idols, Chap. 6)
another feebly attempt by misguided jew and non jew zionists covering up and blaming catholics for the genocide of the white race by the masonic, zionist, satanist talmudic jews and thier mongrelized wasp race traitors
Angela Costant-Whining MSP has callwd on the Women’s Institute, Whitbread Prize & PLC to ‘come out of the dark ages & accept men.’
Good for you, Ange. Nobosy can aay you’re a lunatic SJW of indwterminatw gender!!!
Pingback: Russell Moore and the ERLC Exposed – Occam's Razor
The issue of the church becoming dominated by women is laid out in “Why Men Hate Going to Church” by David Murrow.
I haven’t read the book, but I’ve seen it first hand. After many years in a mainline Protestant church (United Methodist), I left to worship with a fundamental, independent Baptist church. Two completely different worlds. In the Baptist church that I attend (note that there is a huge variation among those that identify as “Baptist”), men outnumber women, and it is clearly a male-dominated church. Women are not permitted to preach or speak from the pulpit. Why? Because The Bible says they are not to do so, and we believe that The Bible is the literal word of God – not subject to the wishes of man.
Contrary to what society would have us believe, the women at our church are happy, fulfilled, and love their church family and their marital family. We all have our role to fill, and understanding and being secure in that role leads to satisfaction in life.
Most churches are dominated by women because they are far more interested in going along with a social and political agenda than they are with actually following God’s word. Those churches then become feminized, driving men away. The issue is not “the church”. The issue is church “leadership” that is more concerned with being politically correct than being spiritually correct.
Pingback: Is Contemporary Christianity a Suicide Cult? – Occam's Razor
Reblogged this on Astonishing Blowback.