Is Mainstream Christianity Dead Set on the Destruction of Western Peoples?
As Western Christianity merges with the value system of Cultural Marxism, this becomes a real question. Take these recent news items:
– US Lutheran churches have made $30 million from government grants and contracts in flooding the USA with Third World refugees.
– Brenda Walker: “Conspirators In Cassocks: Catholic Bishops (But Not Laity) Betraying America”
– Diversity Chronicle: “Pope Francis Invites The Homeless, Undocumented Immigrants And Prostitutes To Exclusive Catered Vatican Banquet” (Granted, this is somewhat of a satire site, but, like the Onion, it digs at deeper taboos.)
– Pope Francis visits Lampedusa to pray for African invasion of Europe.
– Bishop Mark Seitz prays for mestizo invasion of USA.
– Dennis Mangan: “The One, Holy, Catholic, Apostolic, Open-Borders Church”
– John Derbyshire: “White Flight from Christianity?”
In evolutionary terms, has mainstream Christianity become maladaptive for the West? What are some solutions? It’s little wonder that many younger Christians are flocking to Identitarian Christianity or Neopaganism. Will this trend catch on? Should Christians break off of mainstream Catholicism and Protestantism and form schism churches?
Here’s a challenge to open-borders advocates Bryan Caplan and Alex Nowrasteh. While Caplan & Nowrasteh seem thrilled at the idea of flooding white / Western countries with the Third World, they are rather silent on Israel’s immigration policies, such as:
– Israelis sterilizing African immigrants
– Israelis deporting unwanted Africans to Africa
– Israelis deporting unwanted Africans to Sweden
– Israelis advocating ethno-biopolitics at expense of African immigrants
– Israelis wanting to protect Jewish wages and standard of living by opposing African immigration
Not that I personally oppose Israel wanting to restrict immigration from Africa; it’s quite sensible. But if Caplan & Nowrasteh are truly for mass immigration in general (and not harboring some animus against white gentile countries), shouldn’t they be for mass immigration for Israel too? Shouldn’t they be opposed to the above?
But Caplan & Nowrasteh are largely silent on this issue. So, here’s my challenge:
I’d like for Caplan & Nowrasteh to write a series of articles condemning Israel for restricting immigration and demanding that Israel open its borders to the millions of Africans who want to immigrate there.
What I’m advocating is a Fairness Doctrine: For every article or blog post that Caplan & Nowrasteh write demanding that white gentile countries be flooded with the Third World, they should write another article demanding the same for Israel. And I don’t want lackadaisical articles; I want impassioned pleas, some real heavy-handed lobbying, demanding that Israel open its borders to the millions of Africans who want to immigrate there.
Will Caplan & Nowrasteh accommodate, or do their views of “open borders” only apply to white gentile countries?
John Derbyshire has up an insightful post about Japan, wherein he surmises that the 21st century might belong to Japan since Japan appears to hold steadfast in avoiding Third World immigration and to be solving internally its own demographic transition. History suggests that labor shortages (tight labor markets) often lead to greater efficiency and innovation. David Frum wrote recently along these lines about robotics undercutting the “need” for immigrants.
Nonetheless, it has become a mantra in the West that declining birthrates and an aging population will lead to catastrophe — unless we open our borders to the Third World. These warnings, though, often seem greatly exaggerated. Dennis Mangan wrote, “Russia’s population today is about the same as it was in the early 80s. That constitutes a crisis?”
History doesn’t really bear out this supposed demographic crisis. The Malthusian and pre-penicillin West often saw great population vicissitudes that worked themselves out. The Black Death might have killed off 1/3 of the European population, but the end result was tighter labor markets, increased efficiency, and an eventual increased standard of living. Europeans and North Asians are resilient and can respond to changing circumstances.
How the chattering heads could be so wrong about the need for more immigration reflects a central problem with Western democracy today: no effective feedback system. Nick Land writes,
The result is that every effective discovery process — whether economic, scientific, or of any other kind — is subjected to ever-more radical subversion by political influences whose only ‘reality principle’ is internal: based on closed-circuit social manipulation…. Democracy is thus, strictly speaking, a production of collective insanity, or dissociation from reality….
In short, Western democracies believe and promulgate Immigration is Good, and that’s all that matters. Everything else is inconsequential; the Cathedral Hive Mind says so.
Interestingly, a hive mind in nature is generally adaptive. For instance, in a hive of honey bees, various worker bees perform dances demonstrating the location of food. The information of some scouts might be wrong, so the hive mind eventually is able to discern the reliable from the unreliable information, which results in the creation of more honey, an absolute necessity for the survival of winter. If this feedback system fails, the hive dies.
Our Cathedral hive mind, however, figured out how to make honey for multiple winters in one season, which provided immediate benefits, but now results in living off stocked-up capital and inaccurate signaling feedback. The Cathedral has become a closed system, and it no longer receives signal feedback from nature; it is at war with nature.
But in the end, my money is on nature.
Helian Unbound on Derb & Demographics.
In continuing with our “Are Christian Leaders Today a Bunch of Girly Men?” theme, I thought I’d draw attention to a recent development. As noted this summer, a bunch of conservative evangelical Christians formed a group called the Evangelical Immigration Table to promote Third World immigration into the West, which unsurprisingly seems to be funded by George Soros. Well, George Soros this week has paid for a bunch of conservative Evangelicals to fly into Washington DC to demand immigration amnesty from Republican congressmen (see full story here). In short, from the video clips I’ve seen, you see a bunch of girly men talking about how much Jesus just loves Third World immigrants.
Nevermind that Soros is an anti-Christian leftist; hey, Soros likes brown people, and that’s what Christianity is all about these days. Outside the West, Christianity becomes a non-Western religion. Inside the West, Christianity merges with Cultural Marxism. This could end up making traditional Bolshevism look enlightened, as at least its adherents had some survival instinct, unlike the real headline from today: “Christian pathological altruists invite violent and low IQ Third World hordes to dispossess them”.
Continuing along with the theme of the Catholic Church declaring war on the West, it got me to thinking about the most prominent “conservative Catholic” politician in the USA, Sam Brownback, and some of Brownback’s fetishes, such as:
– Not allowing white South Africans to immigrate to USA, although blacks commit genocide against them
– Encouraging tons of non-whites, esp. mestizos, to immigrate to the USA
– And encouraging white people, instead of birthing white babies, to adopt non-white babies
This is what Brownback does in his spare time; he’s even teamed up with George Clooney to attempt to achieve some of the above goals.
Of course, Brownback is not alone in these goals, as they even extend to prominent Protestants like Richard Land, John Piper, and Russell Moore. Christian Cultural Marxism is the norm among nearly all sects of Christianity in the West.
More recently, the ever maudlin Rod Dreher was praising the likes of Caleb Stegall, representative of a new type of “crunchy-con localism”. It’s interesting that for these religious conservatives “localism” seems only to extend to baseball and BBQ, and not the traditional understanding of ethnos or gens, as Stegall made a legal practice of representing whites who tried to steal black babies from Haiti (because Jesus told them to do so). Jim Jones’ notion of the Rainbow Family, extreme during its day, is now the norm for many mainstream Christians.
In short, the modern system is set up to reward whites who encourage pathological altruism and whites to reduce their inclusive fitness, and Christianity is a major player in this system. Anyone who doesn’t see this is willfully blind or a liar.
Is there any hope that a new, pro-Western form of Christianity could arise, or is Christianity in the West doomed?
Thinking Housewife: “The African American Heresy“
Well, not just quite yet, but I suspect that it will within a couple years. The magazine has become a politically correct bore.
TAC started as an exciting venture, headed by Pat Buchanan, Taki Theodoracopulos, and Scott McConnell. But by 2007, both Buchanan and Taki were gone (although TAC still runs Buchanan’s syndicated columns), and TAC slid ever more toward becoming a mouthpiece for the Cathedral. Ron Unz took over around 2007. And while Unz did publish some flawed pieces (most notably on Hispanic crime and race and IQ), he did publish some winners, such as on Jewish affirmative action at elite colleges and Chinese eugenics. Unfortunately, TAC wouldn’t publish Unz’s most recent piece on black crime, which led to the board firing him as publisher and replacing him with Jon Utley.
Who is Jon Basil Utley? I don’t know much about him, but allegedly he wants to make TAC more like an anti-interventionist National Review. And, like many neocons, he is of a Russian Ashkenazi background. While Utley is allegedly an anti-interventionist (or perhaps a more moderate liberal internationalist?) and even critical of the Israel lobby, he seems quite politically correct. For instance, while he’s correct to criticize Christian Zionist fundamentalists for promoting war in the Middle East, he criticizes them for being against mass Third World immigration into Western countries. (Huh? I guess they should welcome their genetic replacement?) Or Mitt Romney’s mild criticism of illegal immigration during the Republican primary Utley calls a “tremendous calumny against immigrants.” In other words, it’s wrong for Westerners to question their own extinction. Under Utley, can we expect TAC even more vigorously to parrot the Cultural Marxist open-borders propaganda?
A friend with ties to TAC tells me that TAC is really strapped for cash and might not be around much longer; allegedly, none of their traditional donors wants to give them more money. Geez, I wonder why?