We’re now on gab.ai, which is attempting to be the free-speech alternative to Twitter.
Follow us at @OccamsRazor.
Wow. Just wow. The depravity of this is truly unbelievable. Over 1,400 young white girls were tortured and sexually molested by Pakistanti gangs for years and no one lifted a finger to stop it because they were afraid they would be called “racist”. In other words, it’s better to have your white children raped and tortured by brown curry pimps than it is to be a “racist”.
I think it’s time we retire the word “racist” from our usage right now. This insidious, Marxist term has already done too much damage. And while we’re retiring things, let’s retire these Rotherham officials and put them in prison. In fact, a major purge of sorts is long overdue throughout the West.
As we reach the 11th hour of the West, we need to ask some serious questions. Like, isn’t it high time for a moratorium on all Third World immigration into the West? Do white people have the right to exist? And if so, how? Shouldn’t whites have racially exclusive homelands to raise their families, just as all other races have including Ashkenazis?
Some must reads:
Kevin MacDonald: “The Rotherham Pathology”
Heartiste: “The Rotherham Evil”
HBD Chick: “Stop creating a climate of fear!”
Statistics on crime and race.
Roger Scruton: “Taking Revenge on Traditional Britain”
Moldbug famously (at least in some quarters) once wrote that Cthulhu only swims left. Having myself recently re-read H. P. Lovecraft’s “The Call of Cthulhu,” I’ve been thinking about what Cthulhu means.
One interesting facet of Lovecraft’s story is how HBD-friendly it is; in fact, “The Call of Cthulhu” could be called “HBD literature,” if such a genre exists. In the story, you find ancient gods (extraterrestrials), which are adamantly worshiped by non-whites, especially blacks, mulattoes, and mestizos. These gods are primordial. Whites, however, seem to have more difficult time intuiting these gods and when they do, they often die. Professor George Gammell Angell, the Norwegian sailor, and the narrator (it’s implied) all die after coming into some form of contact with Cthulhu. It reminds me of a passage from Nicholas Wade’s The Faith Instinct where someone states that Westerners (European-descended people) now seem psychologically incapable of the collective ecstasy of primitive religion.
Sam Francis writes:
Lovecraft’s stories are dramas of modernity in which the forces of tradition and order in society and in the universe are confronted by modernity itself—in the form of the shapeless beings known (ironically) as the “Old Ones.” In fact, they are the “New Ones.” …The conflicts in the stories are typically between some representative of traditional order (the New England old stock protagonist) on the one hand, and the “hordes” of Mongoloids, Levantines, Negroes, Caribbeans, and Asians that gibber and prance in worship of the Old Ones and invoke their dark, destructive, and invincible powers.
The irony of the Old Ones is that evidence of them is often in plain sight, but whites simply cannot see them, when when whites do, it’s often through reason (such as the professor and narrator) and not through spiritual intuition. Most whites, however, will probably never see Cthulhu; they are incapable.
Cthulhu in this sense is like HBD. It’s right there in front of your eyes, but most whites are incapable of seeing it. Outbred Northwest Europeans project their own psychological worldview onto the world and non-whites – for whites, it’s all blank-slate deracinated universalism. For whites, everyone is white. (And even some non-whites strive to be be white.) Whites can’t hear Cthulhu.
One of the wisest things ever said about HBD was actually once said to be my a black man to the effect (paraphrase): “Whites are fighting other whites about HBD. Deep down, most blacks probably know HBD is true, even though whites tell them it is not.”
So if Cthulhu only swims left, it’s because whites allow him to do so by unknowingly ignoring his very existence instead of harnasing his primordial power. To acknowledge Cthulhu is the ultimate red pill. Although Lovecraft had most whites die when coming into contact with Cthulhu, this is not true of HBD. In this case, it’s probably a sine qua non for survival. Maybe the rise of multi-racial states will hasten Cthulhu’s return.
When was it – maybe two or three years ago? – that the open-borders folks were assuring us that there was nothing to worry our little heads about, ’cause illegal immigration was over, ’cause the economy was so bad – or something like that.
(Am I the only one who remembers this?)
Where are they now, as countless women & children, heeding Obama’s summons, flood across our Southern border?
New Creationism can be thought of as the anti-Darwinian religion of many of the far Left.
Terms and Sacred Rites:
New Creationists: Those who profess to believe in Darwinism but deny biological reality of race and seem to think that human evolution for past 50k years has occurred only from the neck down. In other words, New Creationists believe in miracles.
“Race does not exist” – the Nicene Creed of New Creationists (orthodox version)
“Race is a social construct” – the Nicene Creed of New Creationists (reformed version)
In short, New Creationism is the religion of the Cathedral. As the Cathedral subscribes to an ideological form of radical universalism, New Creationism naturally follows from this. And the religious implications are not accidental. Just as many modern values are mere secularized Christian virtues (cf. MacIntyre), so New Creationism is a secularized form of the Christian idea of the unity of mankind through Adam & Eve. The mere thought of taking evolution seriously — i.e. that human biodiversity naturally follows from evolution — is a horrifying thought to the gatekeepers of the Cathedral, so horrifying that the nakedness of evolution must be clothed with the shroud of New Creationism.
To see how much like a religion New Creationism is, look at all the scientific fraud of the last 100 years to promote New Creationist myths.
Mexico holds the record for many things. For instance, Mexico is the fattest country on the planet. Mexico also has the highest rate of diabetes on the planet. (Interestingly, this astronomical rate of diabetes might be a result of the Amerindian ancestry of many Mexicans.) Although not the most violent country in the world (esp. by African standards), Mexico is a very violent county; since 2006, more than 60,000 people in Mexico have been murdered, often the result of gang / cartel rivalries.
And, according to a recent study, it also seems that Mexico might be one of the most genetically diverse countries on the planet. Mexico hosts various groups of Amerindians, Mestizos, and very small groups of Europeans. Interestingly, a few dimwitted Cultural Marxist creationists have tried to spin this study to evince the Cultural Marxist mantra that “biological race doesn’t exist” — as if showing that elements can be blended together demonstrates that atoms don’t exist. Probably most stunning, however, is how shocked people are – or at least pretend to be – by this study. Are they clueless? Where have they been for the past couple decades?
I mean, the CIA World Fact Book for the past couple decades has been reporting that Mexico is: 60% mestizo, 30% Amerindian, and less than 10% European.
Looking at the genetic ancestry of mestizos, Rubén Lisker in 2005 found the average admixture of lower-class mestizos of Mexico City to be: 59% Amerindian, 34% European, and 6% black.
Furthermore, for the past decade at least, HBD writers have been writing on the genetic diversity of Mexico. See Steve Sailer’s: “Importing Mexico’s Worsening Racial Inequality” or SocioBiological Musings’ “What Race Are Hispanics?“. Also interesting is Richard Lynn’s “Pigmentocracy: Racial Hierarchies in the Caribbean and Latin America,” which explores the racial caste system of Latin America showing that the upper-classes tend to be very European, while the lower classes tend to be more Amerindian, mestizo, or mulatto. HBD bloggers have also argued that the cultural designation of ‘Hispanic’ should be broken down into racial groupings, such as Amerindian, Mestizo, European, etc.
The general surprise by many scientists and others who should know better on this topic – the genetic racial diversity of Mexico – only underscores how much HBD is on the cutting edge of science. If these people had been reading HBD writers for the past decade, nothing in this study would really be a surprise.
HBD Chick: “Who Are Our Mexicans?”
Sociobiological Musings: “What Race Are Hispanics?”
Gregory Cochran: “Zones of Thought”
Jason Collins: “Immigration Externalities”
Steve Sailer: “How White Are Hispanics?,” “White v. Hispanic cognitive gap across 39 studies with 5,696,529 sample size,” “Ortiz & Telles: Mexican-Americans lag for 4 generations (at least),” “How do Hispanics score on grad school admissions tests?,” “64% of Hispanic high school graduates don’t score high enough to enlist,” and “PISA and Mexico.”
In the past couple days, “medievalist” Karl Steel and some of his friends, such as Jeffrey Jerome Cohen (and other Cathedral mouthpieces), have been “attacking” HBD and the Dark Enlightenment on Twitter, including a blog post. N.B. by “attacking” I don’t really mean attempting to discredit but pointing and sputtering. And I put “medievalist” in quotes because unlike traditional medievalists who had deep philological understandings of classical and medieval languages (such as Latin, Old High German, Old Norse, Anglo-Saxon, etc.) this group is representative of a new trend, “scholars” short on traditional philological skills but long on the latest pomod theories, which results in applying the latest lit-crit “theory” to an English translation of a text. Yes, Idiocracy, has consumed literary studies. Oh yea, many of them also seem to detest logic and reason (ruses of the white man).
Anyway, browsing through some of their writings, you find the latest fashionable nonsense, like Jeffrey Cohen’s “On the nonexistence of race,” which is all quite comical. It’s trendy these days to claim that race was “invented” in the Enlightenment, although Sarich & Miele easily refuted this claim in the “Ancient Concept of Race“. These Dorothys can keep their eyes closed and continue to click their heels saying “race doesn’t exist,” but it simply won’t change reality. In fact, modern science is showing that no only does race exist but genetic racial divisions are much deeper than previously imagined (see here). Regardless, although these “medievalists” claim race doesn’t exist, I saw one person (now I’ve lost the source) speaking of miscegenation among the Medieval British.
Regarding the last point, “miscegenation among the Medieval British,” these people apparently are ignorant of Bryan Sykes landmark genetics study Blood of the Isles, where Sykes shows how remarkably ethnically homogenous the British Isles are at the genetic level. Steve Sailer writes:
From his database, Sykes concludes that the majority of the genes of the peoples of the British Isles are descended from the oldest of the modern inhabitants: Mesolithic hunter-gatherers, who began arriving 10,000 years ago from Continental Europe after the end of the last Ice Age, as soon as the islands became habitable again.
Regarding the Irish, see the “Ignatiev Fallacy“.
Still, there are different ethnic groups among Europeans. Everyone knows this (and there are HBD differences between ethnic groups). However, the current meme of emphasizing ethnic groups at the expense of larger racial groups hides how closely related many ethnic groups are to each other. What’s remarkable in this instance is how closely related European ethnic groups are to each other vs Non-Europeans. Regarding Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza‘s research on the genetic distances between racial groups, Sailer writes:
Cavalli-Sforza’s team compiled extraordinary tables depicting the “genetic distances” separating 2,000 different racial groups from each other. For example, assume the genetic distance between the English and the Danes is equal to 1.0. Then, Cavalli-Sforza has found, the separation between the English and the Italians would be about 2.5 times as large as the English-Danish difference. On this scale, the Iranians would be 9 times more distant genetically from the English than the Danish, and the Japanese 59 times greater. Finally, the gap between the English and the Bantus (the main group of sub-Saharan blacks) is 109 times as large as the distance between the English and the Danish.
Clearly these ethnic groups are more closely related to each other than to non-Europeans.
And let’s not leave out eugenics (which the Ashkenazis have been practicing for the past 1,000 years) in Medieval Europe. Eugenics, first popularized by Plato and Aristotle, was alive in Medieval Europe with concepts such as “blue blood” or gentillesse (refinement and courtesy resulting from good breeding). Gregory Clark has demonstrated that the children of the upper-classes among Medieval English had a 2:1 survival rate over the poor and that there was much downward mobility, which resulted in the downward drift of genes from the upper-classes to the lower classes, resulting in a general increase in IQ and decrease in violence.
Still, don’t let any of these inconvenient facts get in the way of our current “medievalists” where the Medieval World for them is but a blank canvass on which they can paint the most fashionable and latest lit-crit theory.
Although I may seem a little hard on Karl Steel above, I will say this: From what I’ve seen, Karl Steel seems more intelligent and perhaps one day able to think “outside the Cathedral box” than the ever hysterical Jeffrey Jerome Cohen.
Wesley Morganston: Karl Steel on Human Biodiversity: “Let’s Not Face Facts”